[Development] INTEGRITY

[Giuseppe D'Angelo]

On 18/09/2019 17:33, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> We've never required C++11 Standard Library. We've only required the core
>>> language and the integrity compiler does support it just fine.
>> Not really, it also fails on constexpr:
>>
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/264550
> No, it has a bug in its existing constexpr implementation. That's different.
> MSVC 2015 officially supported constexpr, but we turned it off for them
> because it was too buggy.

<devil's advocate> it still means that we can't require core language 
conformity from our compilers. And we're talking about C++11's 
constexpr, not C++14's.

My 2 c,
-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20190919/9a735920/attachment.bin>