[Development] RFC: handling of C++ feature test macros

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Thu Sep 19 15:28:01 CEST 2019

On 19/09/2019 14:56, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> I think Peppe's concern, while somewhat theoretical, is a valid one.
> I'll talk to SG10 about this so that
> we hopefully never run into the problem in practice.

Thanks! This would also bring up the question on whether it's of any 
importance what values the feature-testing macros are defined to :-)

Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20190919/ca98be3b/attachment.bin>

More information about the Development mailing list