[Development] The future of smart pointers in Qt API

[Giuseppe D'Angelo]

On 02/02/2020 22:45, André Pönitz wrote:
>> This is a logical fallacy; "I don't need it, noone else does".
> But this is the argument the de-Qt-ers use when it comes to Qt convenience
> they don't need.

Which Qt convenience in particular? I seem to be advocating against 
duplication "for the sake of it", not when there's strong arguments 
(e.g. convenience) for it.

Cheers,
-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20200202/045a66d5/attachment-0001.bin>