[Development] [Releasing] HEADS-UP: Qt 5.15 Feature Freeze is in effect now

[Alexander Akulich]

It seems "feature freeze" != "API freeze" and the API review for 5.15
is still "to be done", so we still can raise the objection at the
right time for Qt 5.15.

The API consistency is one of the biggest advantages of Qt and I
really hope that we won't stop caring about it.


On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:58 PM Thiago Macieira
<thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 5 February 2020 02:12:06 PST Alexander Akulich wrote:
> > Oh, I'm sorry for the spam! You already renamed error() getter to
> > sockerError() [1], so the issue is not relevant now.
> > It's a bit unfortunate to see such diversity in the API. error()
> > getter seems to be a convention in Qt. I thought that the same
> > convention is to use '-ed' verbs in signal names.
>
> It is. The correct signal for an error situation is errorOccurred, like in
> QLocalSocket and QProcess.
>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Software Architect - Intel System Software Products
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development