[Development] The future of smart pointers in Qt API

[Vitaly Fanaskov]

> AFAIK, we don't have a procedure to make project-level decisions by majority vote.
True. We're discussing now. The goal here is to take people opinions and 
arguments into account before making a decision.

We have intermediate results of the discussion now. Next step is 
collecting the rest of feedback we can. Only after we should make a 
decision and define resulting artifacts (docs, recommendations, user 
stories, blog posts, etc.).

On 2/12/20 12:42 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
> 12.02.2020, 12:36, "Vitaly Fanaskov" <vitaly.fanaskov at qt.io>:
>>>   You seem to repeat your initial statements.
>> Yes, because most of the participants of this discussion tend to agree,
>> as far as I can see.
> AFAIK, we don't have a procedure to make project-level decisions by majority vote.
>
> If we want to achieve anything more constructive than just summarizing opinions, these
> ways are possible:
> 1) discuss Daniel's patch in Gerrit and get it approved or rejected;
> 2) someone could come up with another proposal in of form of (possibly WIP) patch
> and get it formally reviewed in the same way;
> 3) someone could come up with a text of QUIP and get it formally reviewed
>
-- 
Best Regards,

Fanaskov Vitaly
Senior Software Engineer

The Qt Company / Qt Quick and Widgets Team