[Development] QProperty and library coding guide

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Fri Jul 17 11:21:22 CEST 2020

Il 17/07/20 11:05, Lars Knoll ha scritto:
>> No, we should just static_assert for [[no_unique_address]] being available on the platforms where we expect it. That is, anywhere but on certain MSVCs.
> Some older embedded toolchains don’t have the flag neither.
>> If we make it a configure feature, we open the door to BIC problems as we might accidentally turn it off in some builds.
> We should simply add a static assert that the Qt and the applications build mode are compatible.

But what would be the advantage of switching from the union to the 
attribute? Saving 1 byte per class?

Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20200717/ca1d3960/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the Development mailing list