[Development] QProperty and library coding guide
giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Fri Jul 17 11:21:22 CEST 2020
Il 17/07/20 11:05, Lars Knoll ha scritto:
>> No, we should just static_assert for [[no_unique_address]] being available on the platforms where we expect it. That is, anywhere but on certain MSVCs.
> Some older embedded toolchains don’t have the flag neither.
>> If we make it a configure feature, we open the door to BIC problems as we might accidentally turn it off in some builds.
> We should simply add a static assert that the Qt and the applications build mode are compatible.
But what would be the advantage of switching from the union to the
attribute? Saving 1 byte per class?
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
More information about the Development