[Development] Spam: Re: Commercial-only LTS phase starts: Closing the 5.15 branch(es) on 5th January

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Jan 5 03:21:38 CET 2021

On Monday, 4 January 2021 20:32:27 -03 Scott Bloom wrote:
> The funny thing, I remember at a Qt Dev Days when Qt 5 was about a year
> away.  The "we will never do a Qt 3-4 type major version change again" was
> said time and time again.
> Where functionality was missing, and no one was happy with Qt 4.0 except the
> people who got to say "4.0" released

Both statements are true but their combination is misleading.

Yes, Qt developers promised never to do a Qt 3 to 4 transition again. Yes, Qt 
4.0 was missing some functionality from Qt 3, which made 4.0 an impossible 
target, as well as having brand new functionality that was hadn't yet matured 

But the first statement is taken out of context and thus makes it sound that 
the second statement is the reason for the first. It is not. The reason why we 
didn't want a 4.0 transition is because of the massive amount of code changes 
that were required for code bases to transition to 4.0. That is not the case 
here, as most codebases can compile with 6.x with limited porting effort.

It's also true that some of them can't be ported to 6.0, but once 6.1 and 6.2 
come along, they will be.

The concern raised by people who can't move forward and aren't getting bug 
fixes either is a valid one, though.

Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering

More information about the Development mailing list