[Development] Qt6 repo

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:19:56AM +0000, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
>> On 14 Jan 2021, at 23:23, Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen at gmx.de> wrote:
>I must have missed that. Could you share your idea again, it sounds 
>great.
>
https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2019-September/037465.html

>FWIW, I know it’s popular to blame The Qt Company for all sorts of 
>things right now,
>
no, it _always_ is, for good reasons.

>but as I remember the discussion around dependencies.yaml, it was not 
>driven by The Company at all, but by senior members and maintainers of 
>the Qt community (some of which happened to be TQtC-employees at the 
>time).
>
to me that looks like splitting hairs for the purpose of deflecting 
responsibility. tqtc is in full control of everything that relates to 
CI, so whatever happens in that area is its sole responsibility. that 
the respective devs were apparently not even formally tasked with doing 
that makes things *worse*, not better.

>I would still like to understand how that particular suckfulness 
>impacts the life and work of a maintainer of one of the submodules 
>though.
>
the point is that the bot crap completely and utterly drowns out any 
actual content. even if the respective tooling can be configured to 
always filter this non-content from view, that constitutes falsifying 
history, which doesn't exactly help when reviewing merges, etc.