[Development] HEADS-UP: call for Qt 6.3 API review

[Marc Mutz]

Hi,

There were still several modules unreviewed, and quite some with issues
found (there are a few more now) which appear unfixed (link in the
review to the fix, please).

Since the hit rate was so high, I also went through the already-appoved
ones, and bingo, found the addition of a virtual function, approved now
for the second time (first when merged, now in review).

Please restrain from giving a +2 on the API reviews if you have not read
and understood
https://community.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C%2B%2B#The_Do.27s_and_Don.27ts
first.

I sure hope we didn't miss something like that in 6.2's review (and if
we did, we now know how our users value the BC guarantee :)

Thanks,
Marc
________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces at qt-project.org> on behalf of Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikkinen at qt.io>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:13 PM
To: development at qt-project.org <development at qt-project.org>
Subject: [Development] HEADS-UP: call for Qt 6.3 API review

Hi all,

It is time to do a API review for Qt 6.3 now. Diffs are here: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/topic:%226.3+API+Review%22
Please do the review asap; we need to compete it as soon as possible.

Follow-up task in Jira: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-99883

br,
Jani
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20220201/fe59ae92/attachment.htm>