[Development] Requesting forward BC exception for QtWaylandCompositor in 6.2 and 5.15

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Wed Feb 16 02:42:10 CET 2022


On 16/02/2022 01:21, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 February 2022 11:37:30 PST Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
> wrote:
>> First and foremost, does anyone know whether QtWayland is under any BC
>> promise at all?
> The question must be turned around: does anyone know of an explicit exception
> to BC?
> 
> Because if there isn't one, then it was under BC guarantees.

For instance, QtTestLib is not under BC promises. Various modules in 
their "Tech preview" state weren't. I really don't know about the 
specific module...

Thanks,
-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20220216/d4e8134a/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the Development mailing list