[Development] Qt 6.2.6 LTS Commercial released

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

On Mittwoch, 28. September 2022 10:31:52 CEST Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> > On 27 Sep 2022, at 22:01, Elvis Stansvik <elvstone at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Den tis 27 sep. 2022 kl 21:52 skrev Elvis Stansvik <elvstone at gmail.com>:
> >> Den tis 27 sep. 2022 kl 21:01 skrev Thiago Macieira 
<thiago.macieira at intel.com>:
> >>> On Tuesday, 27 September 2022 09:48:01 PDT Elvis Stansvik wrote:
> >>>> The typical mail here is about development of Qt, and while some of
> >>>> those mails may be specialized and only may not be interesting to
> >>>> *everyone*, they could potentially be interesting to *anyone* (e.g.
> >>>> cover some technical topic they want to learn about etc). I don't
> >>>> think that can be said of commercial-only release announcement, which
> >>>> are for sure only interesting to a certain subset of subscribers, so
> >>>> suggest keeping them on some commercial-only list.
> >>> 
> >>> For me, what's interesting is to know the *date* of the release, because
> >>> it
> >>> sets the 12-month timer for a new open source drop.
> >> 
> >> True :)
> >> 
> >> Open source code drops can be announced here, but I guess there's some
> >> value in knowing about the first commercial-only releases, for those
> >> who want to pencil in the drop date in their calendars.
> > 
> > I guess it's just that I can understand Konstantin's sentiment, since
> > it feels kind of unsolicited. When I signed up for this list, I
> > solicited Qt development conversations. There is a list for
> > announcements after all. It feels like I'm getting a newsletter I
> > didn't sign up for, without a way to unsubscribe without losing all
> > the Qt dev conversations that I do want to follow.
> > 
> > But if most people are OK with it, no problem. It's not a big deal.
> > 
> > Elvis
> 
> Ok; we have announce at qt-project.org specifically for announcing releases, so
> we'll send all future release announcements only to that list, without any
> cross-posting to development at qt-project.org.
> 
> 
All of them, or only the LTS ones? It seems most people didn't mind the open 
source announcements here.

Best regards
Allan