[Development] C++20 comparisons @ Qt (was: Re: C++20 @ Qt)

[Thiago Macieira]

On Wednesday, 20 September 2023 02:53:37 PDT Volker Hilsheimer via Development 
wrote:
> If we can have (1), i.e.
> 
> using Qt::equals;
> equals(a, b);
> 
> why do we need qEquals?

See my other email: the (1) is not discoverable, teachable, or particularly 
understandable by average C++ developers. It is not a good corner of C++. 

(4) (the convenience function) is what users expect. Except that we don't need 
it to be called qEquals, because we have an even better name for it: 

operator==

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5152 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20230920/a7e099d2/attachment.bin>