[Development] Disavowing the Lakos Rule for Q_ASSERT
Ville Voutilainen
ville.voutilainen at gmail.com
Tue Aug 27 00:47:10 CEST 2024
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 at 22:29, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
<development at qt-project.org> wrote:
>
> Il 26/08/24 19:56, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
> > I'd like to request Qt code not obey that rule. In my opinion, it's a defect
> > in the contract implementation rather than on Qt code. The*pre* condition
> > indicates something that must be true before the method is called and
> > therefore the method's own noexcept specification does not apply*yet*.
>
> As far as I've understood, that's only part of the issue. The other part
> of the issue is that code calling the function may break: if you turn
> the failed precondition check into an exception, the exception handling
> will need to bubble it up through code which may not have set up the
> correct unwinding state -- because it rightfully assumed that no
> exception would escape out of a noexcept function.
A contract violation turned into an exception cannot escape out of a
noexcept function. So it won't bubble up.
More information about the Development
mailing list