[Development] Disavowing the Lakos Rule for Q_ASSERT

[Ville Voutilainen]

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 17:15, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
> The point is that this putative mistake has no consequences, today. It remains
> to be seen whether it will with contracts, when those come. When contracts
> come, if those noexcept are a problem, then both libc++ and libstdc++ will
> deploy a solution, which should suffice for us too. Until then, I don't see a
> reason to deprive ourselves of any potential benefits that the noexcept might
> bring.

What benefits?