[Development] Marking the Tech Preview APIs as such
Giuseppe D'Angelo
giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Mon Jan 22 22:15:59 CET 2024
Il 22/01/24 19:03, Shawn Rutledge via Development ha scritto:
>
> I guess your goal is to be able to see it in the header rather than
> having to look up the docs in the cpp file or online? (Alternatively we
> could write all docs in headers, but then the headers get to be large,
> take storage space alongside every installation of Qt binaries, and slow
> down everyone’s compilations, so I guess that’s why we don’t do it that
> way? Or we could somehow include doc diffs in API review patches for
> whatever API the script has already decided is “interesting".)
As I said, it's not just in order to see the tag in the header when the
code is introduced, but also to see that a TP class is getting out of TP
status because the tags are being removed (= the header is being
touched, and will appear in the header review). If \preliminary is
removed from the docs, it won't be obvious at API review time.
My 2 c,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - Trusted Software Excellence
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4244 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20240122/b881bd3b/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the Development
mailing list