[Development] Question about the licensing of the Protobuf-Module

[Alex Blasche]

The fix is here: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtgrpc/+/533391

--
Alex



________________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces at qt-project.org> on behalf of Frank Meerkötter <frank.meerkoetter at basyskom.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 23 January 2024 09:19
To: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Question about the licensing of the Protobuf-Module

Thank you for the clarification

On 22.01.24 19:53, Elias Steurer via Development wrote:
> This was (sadly) a bug, see comments:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-117783
>
> Cheers 👋,
>
> Eli
>
> On 1/22/2024 10:29 AM, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
>> I am looking for a clarification on the licensing of the
>> Protobuf-Module.
>>
>> The code in https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtgrpc.git/tree/src/protobuf
>> has // SPDX-License-Identifier: LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR
>> LGPL-3.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only
>>
>> While the code in
>> https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtgrpc.git/tree/src/protobufqttypes/protobufqtcoretypes
>> has // SPDX-License-Identifier: LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR
>> GPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-GPL-exception-1.0
>>
>> Is this intentional?
>>
>> Can I - wearing a LGPL3-hat - use the protobuf module?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Frank
>>
--
Frank Meerkötter
Development Lead

basysKom GmbH
Robert-Bosch-Str. 7 | 64293 Darmstadt | Germany
Tel: +49 6151 870 589 - 161 | Fax: -199
frank.meerkoetter at basyskom.com | http://www.basyskom.com/

Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 9352
Geschaeftsfuehrende Partner: Heike Ziegler, Alexander Sorg

--
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development