[Development] Should QObject::event() be protected or public?

[Thiago Macieira]

On Friday, 15 March 2024 11:03:19 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 15 March 2024 10:09:31 PDT Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> > I like simple rules. "Overrides should have the same access level as the
> > initial virtual function." is a simple rule.
> 
> Amend that to "... unless there's an explicit reason not to". With that, I'm
> ok. As you can still access by casting to a base, that had better be a good
> reason.

Which actually points to a reason why you'd do it: to make it *more* 
accessible (make public, or make a private become protected).

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5152 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20240315/8e222103/attachment.bin>