[Development] Compromise: Modified Lakos Rule

[Thiago Macieira]

On Saturday 7 September 2024 18:31:27 CEST Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> Another thing I neglected to mention is that there are two distinct
> steps here. The first is to change certain Q_ASSERT()s into Q_PRE()
> (say) precondition checks that optionally throw on violation. This has
> nothing to do with C++26/29 contacts.

And this proprietary solution of ours could be made so it throws for user-
compiled inline code, but not for the same inline functions compiled inside 
the Qt libraries. In this case, I agree it can be done.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5152 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20240907/accea6c8/attachment.bin>