[Development] Fw: Requesting a repository for Qt Tasking

Jaroslaw Kobus Jaroslaw.Kobus at qt.io
Mon Jun 30 07:54:42 CEST 2025


Redirecting the discussion to the right list...

Jarek


Public
________________________________________
From: Jaroslaw Kobus <Jaroslaw.Kobus at qt.io>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 7:30 AM
To: Volker Hilsheimer
Cc: Qt Development
Subject: Re: Requesting a repository for Qt Tasking


Hi Volker,

the reason for qt/qttasking was that some classes are defined in QtTasking namespace, like "If", "Else", etc...
So, it was just for consistency. But I'm fine to call the repo qt/qttasktree.

I don't anticipate any non-TaskTree related additions there.

Jarek

________________________________________
From: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer at qt.io>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2025 7:49 PM
To: Jaroslaw Kobus
Cc: Qt Development
Subject: Re: Requesting a repository for Qt Tasking



> On 25 Jun 2025, at 12:10, Jaroslaw Kobus <Jaroslaw.Kobus at qt.io> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to request a new repository for TaskTree solution, which is used for more than 2 years already inside QtCreator.
> More info: https://wiki.qt.io/TaskTree
>
> Name of the repository: qt/qttasking
> Description: Task tree is a generic framework for automatic management of asynchronous tasks
> Responsible person: Jarek Kobus
> Gerrit user/email: jkobus / jaroslaw.kobus at qt.io
>
> Best regards
>
> Jarek


Hey Jarek,

Given the description being explicit about Task Tree, is there any particular reason why the repo wouldn’t be called “qt/qttasktree”?

I.e. do you anticipate any classes and frameworks to be added in the future that are not directly part of the TaskTree framework, but still fit into the wider domain of task scheduling and management?

Volker



More information about the Development mailing list