[Development] The future of QProperty and QBindable

[Ulf Hermann]

> What's the benefit of not generating it on the C++ level? I mean, I 
> understand you _can_ do that, but I don't quite see why you would prefer 
> to introduce an inconsistency like that?

QML will need a notification signal if we remove support for bindables 
and Robert wants to search-replace his properties that only have a 
bindable. I could force him to write an extra signal into the header for 
each of his properties but he won't like that. The other solution is to 
have moc generate a metaobject-only signal via a special directive for 
QML to use. There is precedence for the "default" already. We have it 
for WRITE at least.

best,
Ulf