[Interest] Qt Licensing?
annulen at yandex.ru
Fri Oct 28 14:21:22 CEST 2011
28.10.2011, 16:19, "Sathishkumar Duraisamy" <bewithsathish at gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru> wrote:
>> 28.10.2011, 16:08, "Sathishkumar Duraisamy" <bewithsathish at gmail.com>:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Is there any change in license in Qt 5?
>>> That is, now we have LGPL license which allows dynamic binding with Qt
>>> 4. In Qt 5, is it allowed static binding? ( I looking for Qt in use
>>> with embedded :) )
>> Who told you that LGPL disallows static linking?
> Well, then I had misunderstood the license. ( I misunderstood as only
> open source apps can be statically linked while commercial apps must
> be dynamically linked).
Than you should read it more carefully :)
More information about the Interest