[Interest] Qt Licensing?

[Konstantin Tokarev]

28.10.2011, 16:19, "Sathishkumar Duraisamy" <bewithsathish at gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru> wrote:
>
>>  28.10.2011, 16:08, "Sathishkumar Duraisamy" <bewithsathish at gmail.com>:
>>>  Hi all,
>>>
>>>  Is there any change in license in Qt 5?
>>>
>>>  That is, now we have LGPL license which allows dynamic binding with Qt
>>>  4. In Qt 5, is it allowed static binding? ( I looking for Qt in use
>>>  with embedded :) )
>>  Who told you that LGPL disallows static linking?
>
> Well, then I had misunderstood the license. ( I misunderstood as only
> open source apps can be statically linked while commercial apps must
> be dynamically linked).

Than you should read it more carefully :)

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin