[Interest] Qt5 - my hopes for when the dust settles...
andre at familiesomers.nl
Thu Aug 16 15:09:34 CEST 2012
Op 16-8-2012 15:02, Mark Summerfield schreef:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
> Jason H <scorp1us at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> - A new model/view architecture that is a lot easier to use and which
>> designed from the ground up to work well with databases.
>> I complain about it too, but I cannot suggest a better one than what
>> exists. For all its complexity it works well.
> There was a Model/View NG project...
Which basically became what we have now in QML, if I am correct.
>>> - High-level support for client/server programming with the middleware
>> able to be straight TCP/IP (e.g., for LANs), OpenVPN, etc.
>> QtSOAP is not good enough, however, I think a Q-Object based SOAP proxy
>> should not be that hard. This fall I worked on stuff that uses a lot of
>> QMeta. I can think it can be done, if only Qt XML support did not suck.
> Sending XML isn't the issue (and is wasteful of bandwidth anyway). I was
> thinking of signals/slots that used RPC so that a client can emit a
> signal thats recevied in a slot on a server and vice versa.
libqxt already provides that.
More information about the Interest