[Interest] Is Nokia officially done with Qt?

lars.knoll at nokia.com lars.knoll at nokia.com
Sat Jun 16 11:49:17 CEST 2012

Thanks John and all the others voicing their support.

Many things are indeed rather unclear yet, so please give me and the
others Qt developers from Nokia a break. We're working very hard trying to
get some clarity here and finding solutions.

But don't forget that Qt is an open source project, and that there is a
large interest into it from many different industries. So Qt will live on
whatever happens.

The contributor summit is coming up in a couple of days in Berlin. I hope
we'll know more by then.


On 6/16/12 11:10 AM, "ext John Layt" <jlayt at kde.org> wrote:

>On 16 June 2012 09:43, Linos <info at linos.es> wrote:
>> El 16/06/12 10:27, Stefan Walter escribió:
>>> Let's wait for a proper official statement from Nokia about the future
>>>of Qt.
>>> Stop this desperate thoughts about forking Qt, because if Nokia will
>>>support it in the future or not will not change the existence of the Qt
>> +1, seriously, i think this is not helping in any way, we need to wait
>>for an
>> official statement.
>Indeed.  We have the Qt Contributors Summit next week where everyone
>actually involved in developing Qt will be meeting to discuss our
>future plans, and you can be sure we will be discussing this in
>Anyone who suggests forking seriously underestimates the resources
>required to run a project like Qt.  There is no point to a fork, it's
>just splitting resources.  Whatever happens needs to be as a single
>project under Open Governance.
>Let's wait and see what happens in the next couple of weeks..
>Interest mailing list
>Interest at qt-project.org

More information about the Interest mailing list