[Interest] Why QString and not std::string?

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Saturday 16 June 2012 Jun, Michael Seydl wrote:
> I'd say one reason is the encoding awareness of QString alone is a good reason. Fiddling around with libicu and alike is a mess. Regarding the int to string thing. Who codes C++ without boost nowadays? boost::lexical_cast ftw.
> 

I actually don't know anyone directly who codes C++ _with_ boost.

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt
http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl