[Interest] Why QString and not std::string?

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Saturday 16 June 2012 Jun, Michael Seydl wrote:
> When there's no Qt I definitely would use boost. It's header only ... mostly ... very portable and provides everything one could need. Asio, regex, filesystem, spirit ... But that's the Qt mailing list don't wanna make advertisement for another library here. ;)

If there were no Qt, yeah... I guess I would use -- Wait. I think I'd open a second-hand bookshop or something like that. I'd probably stop coding.


-- 
Boudewijn Rempt
http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl