[Interest] Is Nokia officially done with Qt?

[wargand at gmx.de]

Of course not. ;-)

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:38:18AM +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:

> On 16/06/2012, at 7:56 PM, wargand at gmx.de wrote:
>
>
> >> ...and keeping the Q prefix is also be a big win...
> >
> > Don't think so. Qt belongs to Microsoft now (sort of). It is not
> > beyond them to use trademark threads to throw a spanner in the
> > works. The name might be different enough so the have no chance to
> > win, but could the community fight such a battle? So why risk it?
>
>
> sorry, Qt does not belong to Microsoft. Neither does Nokia.
>