[Interest] Qt on Windows Phone 8

[qtnext]

if I understand  correctly ... at this time :
- Ios  : QT5 qml can be port to ios regarding V8
- WP8 : Qml qt5 use opengl acceleration, WP8 will use only directx 11 .. 
perhaps angle lib is the solution ?


Le 21/06/2012 14:33, Till Oliver Knoll a écrit :
> 2012/6/21 Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru>:
>>
>> 21.06.2012, 15:05, "Till Oliver Knoll" <till.oliver.knoll at gmail.com>:
>>> As for iOS, I've heard that "No JavaScript interpreter allowed" is a
>>> problem to properly port Qt/QML on the iPhone/iPad (that comes from
>>> the App Store rule that "No interpreter allowed" - not specifically
>>> JavaScript).
>> However, Lua interpreter is allowed.
> Yes, true! In fact, I have to revise my previous statements:
>
> * Apple apparently /allows/ interpreters in apps, as long as your app
> doesn't have the capability to download /external/ code to be
> interpreted (as to circumvent the "In-App purchase" - again, an
> "economical reason", not a "technical based one")!
>
> * The reason why I wrongly stated that Apple would disallow
> (JavaScript) interpreters in general was because I read (on this list)
> that people had trouble with porting the V8 JS engine (of Qt 5/QML).
> But /not/ because that was forbidden per se, but rather because of
> Just In Time compilation which apparently does not work/is forbidden
> on iOS, due to sandbox restrictions (or so; didn't bother to go into
> details here):
>
> "If you embed your own interpreter engine (any programming language),
> you will have to disable JIT (or any other dynamic executable code
> generation), as writing executable code will not work in the app
> sandbox on stock OS iOS devices."
> [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6482643/v8-javascript-engine-and-mac-app-store]
>
>
> So, for Apple basically as long as it is made sure that you pay your
> 30% to Apple for every buck you earn they don't lock you in into a
> specific technology or language (even though the "economical
> constraints" do have technical implications, off course).
>
> And I think Microsoft will just follow the same reasoning when it
> comes to allowing apps on Windows 8 Mobile (or whatever it will be
> called) - or Windows 8 desktop, should there ever be a similar "App
> Store".
>
> Cheers, Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest