[Interest] Qt is good because...

[Christopher Wilson]

I'd like to second André's points. I initially started programming
gtkmm and sigc++ a few years ago. When I switched to Qt, my life
suddenly became so much easier with the best documentation and clear
and consistent API. I can now quickly develop applications and, as Bo
said, the toolkit gets out of my way.

It also has very good addon library support such as Qwt,
qextserialport, libqxt, and more, many of which follow similar APIs as
Qt main. Qwt in particular has saved me so many headaches.

Sincerely,
Chris

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Andre Somers <andre at familiesomers.nl> wrote:
> Op 26-3-2012 23:24, Quim Gil schreef:
>> Hi,
>>
>> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-is-Good
>>
>> Please help creating a list of points explaining why Qt is good compared
>> to other alternatives for application developers.
>>
>> Let’s focus on specifics: contrastable proof points and experiences from
>> developers working in different platforms are greatly appreciated.
>>
>> You can reply here or edit directly the wiki. In any keep I'll do my
>> best keeping all the relevant information in the wiki page.
>>
>> Thank you!
> The two main points are for me:
> * The documentation is clearly best-of-breed, and
> * The API's are generally clear and consistent, making the framework
> easy to learn and predictable
>
> As a bonus: it has a great community around it! :-)
>
> André
>
>> --
>> Quim
>> _______________________________________________
>> Interest mailing list
>> Interest at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest