[Interest] Direction of Qt [Was: Re: QML Runtime]
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Sat Feb 2 01:06:47 CET 2013
On sábado, 2 de fevereiro de 2013 00.56.57, André Pönitz wrote:
> Both worlds currently barely overlap, and while there is some motion to
> bridge the divide it's hard to imagine a reconciliation in the next few
> years. So the options are more or less that either side A is forcefully
> abandoned, or side B is forcefully abandoned, or that there will be a
> more or less peaceful coexistence between the two. Given the open nature
> of the project, anything "forceful" would be difficult to achieve so my
> second prediction is that we'll see both worlds alive for "eternity".
> Whether there will be a dominant side, and if so which, is up to the
> project contributors and users to influence.
Well said, André. That's my opinion too: both sides will continue to co-exist
for the foreseeable future. If any side gets an upper hand, it will be due to
the collective efforts of the people involved and the evolution of the
I actually, fully do expect QML to come out dominant for the UI (all form
factors) but not for any number crunching, with JS being relegated to what CSS
stylesheets are today: minor touches or poor coding practice.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Interest