[Interest] QtQuick ColorAnimation not working as expected

[Michael Brasser]

Hi Alessandro,
A ColorAnimation will automatically "match" color properties in a Transition or Behavior (where it can see whether a property of type QColor has changed), but this does not apply to standalone animations like the example.
The difference in this case between PropertyAnimation and ColorAnimation would only be that ColorAnimation is more strongly typed (so e.g. there should be an error if assigning a number to "to", and the internal interpolation should be slightly more optimized).

Regards,Michael
> From: Alessandro.Portale at digia.com
> To: prismatic.project at gmail.com; interest at qt-project.org
> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:52:23 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Interest] QtQuick ColorAnimation not working as expected
> 
> ... and adding
>     property: "color"
> to Preet's ColorAnimation version makes it work again. But then I wonder what the difference that one and the PropertyAnimation version is. Any idea, anyone?
> 
> Br,
> Alessandro
> ________________________________________
> From: interest-bounces+alessandro.portale=digia.com at qt-project.org [interest-bounces+alessandro.portale=digia.com at qt-project.org] on behalf of Portale Alessandro [Alessandro.Portale at digia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 15:45
> To: Preet; <interest at qt-project.org>
> Subject: Re: [Interest] QtQuick ColorAnimation not working as expected
> 
> I can reproduce that Preet's ColorAnimation version does not work. Neither with released Qt 5.2.1 nor with Qt 5.3.0-beta. Both dynamic builds. Right now it looks like a bug to me.
> 
> Br,
> Alessandro
> ________________________________________
> From: interest-bounces+alessandro.portale=digia.com at qt-project.org [interest-bounces+alessandro.portale=digia.com at qt-project.org] on behalf of Preet [prismatic.project at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 15:35
> To: <interest at qt-project.org>
> Subject: Re: [Interest] QtQuick ColorAnimation not working as expected
> 
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Alex Montgomery <apmontgomery at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are you statically linking Qt? If you are, this might be your problem:
> > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-37341
> 
> I'm not linking against Qt statically. I'm linking against Qt (built
> latest stable 5.3? from git) as a shared lib on Linux (Arch, 64-bit
> 3.13)... it's bizarre that you'd only run into the issue when you
> linked to it statically. Were you linking against the exact same build
> when you tested both dynamic/static? Hopefully the bug report you
> filed will shed some further light.
> 
> 
> Preet
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20140325/f2d7eae3/attachment.html>