[Interest] STILL LOOKING for a QPA

[Tomasz Olszak]

2014-05-20 15:23 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Siekierda <sierdzio at gmail.com>:
> On 20 May 2014 14:17, Knight Andrew <Andrew.Knight at digia.com> wrote:
>>> Where are the docs?
>>
>> QPA is an internal API, so don't expect any formal documentation or compatibility promises.
>
> I don't think this is a good idea to hide the documentation for QPA...
> Qt is advertised as cross-platform, and since Qt 5 the motto is "oh
> yeah, and it's actually simple to port to new platforms now". I
> remember the talk around 5.0 and 5.1 was "we're working on the
> documentation, it is not ready yet". Now you seem to be saying "that's
> not our problem". This is not good. The easier Qt is to port, the more
> users and ports will it have.
>
> Good day to you all,
> sirdzio
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

It's not that it is hidden. It's private so that it can change in next
non patch version. You can use it on your own responsibility and many
developers, especially in embedded world, do that.
Minimal documentation is a fact, anyone can change that :).

-- 
regards,
Tomasz Olszak