[Interest] pb with 530 official release and MAC/OS

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue May 20 21:13:14 CEST 2014

Em ter 20 maio 2014, às 19:04:39, maitai at virtual-winds.org escreveu:
> Thanks for your reply
> Why is removing the processEvent the right thing to do?

Because processEvents() means nested event loops. You shouldn't do that. You 
should show() and then return;, so the non-nested event loops resumes 

If you do need to blocking-show, then don't use show(), just use exec().

I'm interested in knowing whether there's a lock up if you use any of the 
above solutions. And exactly what you mean by "lock".
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

More information about the Interest mailing list