[Interest] Q_FOREACH creating copy , was (no subject)

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Wed Jul 1 17:20:51 CEST 2015

On Wednesday 01 July 2015 13:59:36 Prav wrote:
> > But yes, this is a task for which I already know the result.
> If  you  know  the result there is only one way ... it is to add new macro
> ... but you are statically blocking this way too. This means for me that
> only enough quantity of people can change this ... so we can return back to
> this idea if some number of people will show up voting for const-ref loops
> in Qt. If someone want such thing in Qt you can vote for
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-46961

I've already said I will not accept a new macro that has a performance 
difference of less than a microsecond for Qt containers.

The task is closed.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

More information about the Interest mailing list