[Interest] Indie Mobil Program terminated?

[John C. Turnbull]

That's why you don't charge anywhere near $350/month/developer.  That's the
whole problem I am trying to solve.  Most indie, small and moderate
businesses simply can't afford that.

But if you charge them something much, much less for a commercial license
and then Qt recoups its costs from a small slice of royalties, everyone is
happy!

The in-house license would be more expensive per month but would mostly be
used by larger corporations.

-----Original Message-----
From: interest-bounces+ozemale=ozemail.com.au at qt-project.org
[mailto:interest-bounces+ozemale=ozemail.com.au at qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Thiago Macieira
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 5:36 AM
To: interest at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Indie Mobil Program terminated?

On Saturday 11 July 2015 03:12:05 John C. Turnbull wrote:
> But you're just focusing on the indie license. I am not even talking 
> about an indie license, just an in-house license and a commercial license.

That makes it even worse. The price of a commercial licence is
$350/month/developer. At a 5% cut, that means $6800 net revenue per month to
break even with current prices, assuming you're working alone. Multiply that
by the number of developers.

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest