[Interest] Need argumentative help..... giving qobject copy/assignment constructor and put it in qlist/qmap

Jason H jhihn at gmx.com
Tue Jul 21 21:18:35 CEST 2015


Once I was put in charge of a project where an "engineer" had replaced (inherited) all the Qt Q* classes used in the project to classes that did not have a 'Q' as a first letter. No other changes. And yes, that "engineer" was a contractor.


> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 1:03 PM
> From: "Gunnar Roth" <gunnar.roth at gmx.de>
> To: "Guido Seifert" <wargand at gmx.de>
> Cc: interest at qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Need argumentative help..... giving qobject copy/assignment constructor and put it in qlist/qmap
>
> Well here people who write that kind of code become project lead or product managers , so they can no longer harm the code ;-)
> 
> > Am 21.07.2015 um 18:34 schrieb Guido Seifert <wargand at gmx.de>:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> 
> > 
> >> hi,
> >> 
> >> i wonder why you just don't store QObject* in the lists?
> >> moving from objects to pointers should be "just" flei├čarbeit ;)  
> > 
> > 
> > I 'inherited' the code. And yes, this is exactly what I do now... though it is not 'just' flei├čarbeit. To reintroduce proper memory management
> > proved to be a real challenge. :-/
> > 
> > As I said earlier... the programmers here are not bad, but I get the feeling that the sprints might be a bit too demanding. Shortcuts are taken,
> > which no experienced programmer would take voluntarily if he has a choice. :-( 
> > 
> > Guido
> > _______________________________________________
> > Interest mailing list
> > Interest at qt-project.org
> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>



More information about the Interest mailing list