[Interest] Bounties?

md at rpzdesign.com md at rpzdesign.com
Thu Mar 12 10:15:46 CET 2015


Bo:

I am quite shocked.

Is 5.4.1 QML so buggy as to be un-usable for mobile development?

Is the 5.4.1 mysql support so unstable as to be un-usable?

Are you saying that widgets is STILL the way to go for mobile in 5.4.x+?

Does Viking software survive in 5.4.x + only via Enterprise support?

Are the reported bugs really not getting fixed in any timely fashion?

Cheers,

md

On 3/12/2015 1:36 AM, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> Den 11-03-2015 kl. 21:36 skrev Bernhard:
>> I did not say that we *cannot* continue with Qt. What I say is that it gets
>> more painful and difficult.
>> For our current projects there are no options anyway.
>>
>> But there may be projects in the future at other companies where I will get
>> asked again "What would do you think about Qt?". And I will need to say:
>> "Years ago I had the impression that quantity and quality are at an optimal
>> balance but this changed in my opinion". What a pity. However if enterprise
>> support actually improves this then at least for mid-size and bigger
>> companies this not a problem.
>>
>> I started using Qt with 4.0.0 and pretty much fell in love with it... seems
>> my cutie is letting itself go ;-)
>
> I know how you feel. And I started with 0.4 :)
>
> However, since 5.3 it's improved a lot. QML is still buggy to a point
> where it's quality is way lower than the rest of the system. But Qt
> itself (for widget based applications) in 5.3 and 5.4 is IMHO almost as
> good as 4.8. IIRC, I think it was around version 4.3 or 4.4 before I
> started to really push Qt 4 to my customers. Qt 5 is following in much
> the same curve, although the changes from 4 to 5 were less disruptive
> than from 3 to 4 so the comparison might not be fair.
>
> I think Qt Company is doing a good job of improving the 5 series one
> release after another.
>
> Bo Thorsen,
> Director, Viking Software.
>



More information about the Interest mailing list