[Interest] Commercial license for embedded project

[Daniel França]

Same here, I was trying to convince other people to use Qt,
but it's really complicated when the website is not clear about which
license you need to deploy mobile apps, and the only commercial license
available costs $300/month.

Em seg, 2 de nov de 2015 às 11:18, Gian Maxera <gmaxera at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Daniel, I agree with you.
> An even worst, now all the website offering a library competing with Qt as
> a clear pricing table with all information.
> I really don’t understand why Qt decided so.
> I remember the old website of Qt… on the menu there was a “Pricing” entry
> and a clear page with all prices. Was so clear. Why they removed that I
> don’t know… and no one on this mailing list got an answer. We asked various
> time and no answer at all about this strange decision that seems to not
> improve the Qt clients.
>
> I always remain with Qt because I know Qt for a long time and I know how
> good is its products … but I found difficult to show to my colleques
> because the new website it’s so confused, lacks of pricing table, lacks of
> examples :-(
>
> Ciao,
> Gianluca.
>
>
> On 2 Nov 2015, at 10:11, Daniel França <daniel.franca at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is not a good solution, most of the people will simple give up as
> they can't find a simple information as that clearly in the website.
> I would have give up if I didn't know about Qt before.
>
>
>
> Em dom, 1 de nov de 2015 às 23:06, mark diener <rpzrpzrpz at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Peter:
>>
>> You can contact directly by phone any office of Qt worldwide and they
>> have sales people that will answer your questions about pricing.
>>
>> md
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Peter Kümmel <syntheticpp at gmx.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Does anybody know the price of a commercial Qt license for an embedded
>>> project?
>>> I tried to get an answer via the qt.io web-formular multiple times but
>>> got no answer.
>>>
>>> We wanna link Qt statically to reduce the binary size. When using
>>> link-time-optimization
>>> we could shrink the binary size to nearly a half. Does anyone have more
>>> experience on this?
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Interest mailing list
>>> Interest at qt-project.org
>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Interest mailing list
>> Interest at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20151102/4736c771/attachment.html>