[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

[Nye]

> I’m really thinking about it actually but I don’t want QtCreator
contributions to go in vein and I think it will come to a point where no
one will use it anymore in someday :(

Well, the thing is many people aren't so willing to switch IDEs they've
worked with for years, even if they admittedly have some small
bugs/deficiencies. You certainly haven't convinced me.

I don't care much for the C++11 and "everything is auto/lambda" development
technique, so I don't need the CLang code model and consequently my creator
is fast, stable and has no problem with completion. "Auto" confuses me as
much as any code model I suppose.

Refactoring is a fancy word for rewriting code, no? So basically you want
your IDE to write the methods' skeletons? I'm pretty sure that creator have
this although I don't use it. It seems quite faster for me to write it down
directly, utilizing hevaily(!) code completion; just works out of the box
for me and it's stable as hell.

So, finally why would I want to switch to a Java based IDE (I agree with
Nuno Santos on the point of Java)? It'd give me what exactly besides the
few months I have to invest in learning its tweaks, shortcuts (or remap
them) and behavior/UI? Sorry, man, your case is simply crumbling ...

Kind regards.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Emre Besirik <nomercy at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On 05 Apr 2016, at 16:41, André Somers <andre at familiesomers.nl> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Op 05/04/2016 om 15:28 schreef NoMercy:
> >> Check out the bug report link in first mail.
> >>
> >>
> > So, start contributing to CLion... Why do you need Creator to be
> effectively dumped for that?
> >
> > André
>
>
> I’m really thinking about it actually but I don’t want QtCreator
> contributions to go in vein and I think it will come to a point where no
> one will use it anymore in someday :(
>
> Python has its own IDE right? who uses it actually?
>
> Regards,
> Emre Beşirik
> nomercy at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160405/dd92b725/attachment.html>