[Interest] QLocalSocket bug?
Giuseppe D'Angelo
dangelog at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 11:48:46 CET 2016
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal
<etienne.sandre at m4x.org> wrote:
> This was not really a complain but just a comment, since both classes have
> nearly the same interface they could derive from a common one.
To say it all, QAbstractSocket is deemed to be a mistake in Qt.
There's no useful way of managing sockets through the base class API.
"Static polymorphism" would've fitted just as well.
My 2 c,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
More information about the Interest
mailing list