[Interest] QLocalSocket bug?

Giuseppe D'Angelo dangelog at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 11:48:46 CET 2016


On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal
<etienne.sandre at m4x.org> wrote:
> This was not really a complain but just a comment, since both classes have
> nearly the same interface they could derive from a common one.

To say it all, QAbstractSocket is deemed to be a mistake in Qt.
There's no useful way of managing sockets through the base class API.
"Static polymorphism" would've fitted just as well.

My 2 c,
-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo



More information about the Interest mailing list