[Interest] 5.8 Features?
ekke
ekke at ekkes-corner.org
Wed Jun 22 11:43:33 CEST 2016
Am 22.06.16 um 11:31 schrieb Xavier Bigand:
> I made few tests for a personal project with Qt Quick Controls 2 on
> Android and was not convinced. Because for a full GUI application it
> still too far from the same GUI made with the Android SDK.
take a look at this example app: blog http://bit.ly/qt-drawer-nav-x
and at github: https://github.com/ekke/drawer_nav_x
Drawer, Bottom Navigation, FAB, Popup, Toast, StackView, SwipeView,
Pages, ...
some fine-tuning is already in-development (have written bugreports for
this)
>From my POV you can write good looking Android Material Apps
the only controls I'm missing are Date- and Time Pickers
I'm still evaluating, but have a good feeling that Qt 5.7 will be great
for mobile business apps I'm writing
ekke
> I still think that for small applications that is preferable to
> develop them with the platform SDK as they contains all features. But
> for middle and biggest applications it can be different especially if
> desktop platforms are also target.
> There is an other reason why I think that it is preferable to use
> platform SDK, it is for commercial application that want to try to be
> featured by mobile stores, it would be easier to integrate latest SDK
> features,...
>
>
> I am working on big application with a 3D engine that runs on mobile
> and desktop, we are using Qt Quick for the GUI, everything else is in
> standard C++. For feature specific to the platform (in-app,
> social,...) we use platform SDK and it's not that long to do the job 2
> or 3 times for those features.
>
> Qt represent a big time saver for the GUI for us mainly because of the
> property binding that allow us to adapt the GUI easily and efficiently
> to the screen size, and tweak it per platform, product version,...
>
> And now I am trying to replace our 3D engine by qt3d to improve the
> user experience, the compatibility on desktop, the performances and be
> able to use different rendering techniques on desktop.
>
>
>
>
> 2016-06-22 10:45 GMT+02:00 ekke <ekke at ekkes-corner.org
> <mailto:ekke at ekkes-corner.org>>:
>
> Am 22.06.16 um 10:36 schrieb Bo Thorsen:
> > Den 21-06-2016 kl. 22:55 skrev Jason H:
> >> I feel like the last few releases have been run by the trolls, and
> >> not the users of Qt. I was hoping open governance would enable the
> >> community to direct Qt development, but I seem to have
> misinterpreted
> >> what it means. I'm looking for what's going into 5.8.. not much
> >> listed on the releases page.
> >>
> >> I'd like to suggest that mobile get some much needed love.
> >> - Application state transitions; Foreground, background
> >> - Background processing API
> >> - Screen wake lock API
> >> - In-app Notifications: local, remote
> >>
> >> While I have those characterized as "mobile" there are things like
> >> notifications occurring on desktop platforms.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >
> > There's only one reason why you don't see more features for the
> mobile
> > parts: There are not enough developers on it. And that's not because
> > QtCompany is doing anything wrong, they just have their priorities
> > different from what you have.
> >
> > Personally I don't care about mobile at all. I haven't had a mobile
> > customer since 2011 and I don't see that changing. My focus is
> almost
> > entirely on Linux embedded and Windows desktop. Those are the areas
> > where a lot of applications are written.
> >
> > I'd love to see the mobile platforms thrive. But unless you Qt users
> > start becoming Qt developers and contribute to it, I don't see that
> > happening.
> hmmm
> the only reason for me to use Qt is mobile
> using new Qt Quick Controls 2 Qt is a great platform for mobile app
> development and I hope many new developers will start with Qt on
> mobile
> to make this easier I'm writing example apps and a blog series
> http://j.mp/qt-x
>
> I really hope that there will be development on the topics Jason H
> mentioned above
>
> ekke
>
> >
> > Bo Thorsen,
> > Director, Viking Software.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org <mailto:Interest at qt-project.org>
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
>
>
>
> --
> Xavier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160622/f05b9600/attachment.html>
More information about the Interest
mailing list