[Interest] universal builds on OS X
René J. V. Bertin
rjvbertin at gmail.com
Wed Jun 22 12:51:35 CEST 2016
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Out of interest, for what purpose? There hasn't been a 32-bit Mac built
> since before 2008. Does current Qt and Xcode even support an OS X
> version old enough to run on a 32-bit Mac?
It's a question I've been asking myself, but AFAIK 10.9 still runs on 32bit
hardware. I haven't seen any indication that Qt 5.6 or 5.7 require 10.8 or
newer, and 10.7 *definitely* still runs on 32bit hardware. With its own Xcode of
course. So yes, there's still a purpose.
FWIW, there are drivers for things like (older though by no means ancient)
scanners that exist only in 32bit. Having the possibility to build applications
supporting that type of hardware as universal binaries and then starting them in
32bit mode is a big advantage. That's an actual example I "have to live with"
(not with a Qt app but it could well have been).
R.
More information about the Interest
mailing list