[Interest] Emitting signal from QThread::run()

[Prav]

>> Why you so easily mixed "signals and slots" in this statement.
>> Signals are NOT slots ... so if slots in subclassed from QThread object
>> usually gives not what people naturally expect, it does not mean that
>> signals are dangerous too.
>> 
>> Signals are just methods like any user's calculation code. What is wrong
>> with them? So without argumentation I do not get why signals in
>> QThread::run() is better to avoid.

> The argument is *because* it confuses people. You're right in your statement
> that signals are not slots and that the code actually works. But people keep
> asking about the thread affinity of the sender class (the QThread-derived one),
> which is irrelevant in the context.

> It's not a matter of "works". It's a matter of "confusing".

Ok  ...  this  makes  sense.


And ... I am wondering all the time why "live  in  thread"  is  not
considerent as "confusing" and still not decided to be removed from docs?