[Interest] Are slots even needed these days?
Bob Hood
bhood2 at comcast.net
Wed Mar 16 23:41:33 CET 2016
On 3/16/2016 3:37 PM, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:31:33PM +0000, Gian Maxera wrote:
>>> I can connect to Foo::bar either way. If I don't intend to ever use
>>> the old-style connect syntax, is there a reason to have "public
>>> slots:" anymore?
>> One reason that for me it’s fundamental: Readability of your code !!!
> It doesn't make the code more readable then a comment
>
> // This is a slot !!!
> void foo();
I would argument that it /does/when you have legions of people out there
already conditioned to this:
...
public slots:
void bar();
void foo();
...
instead of:
...
// This is a slot!!!
void foo();
...
// Oh, hey, this is a slot too!!!
void bar();
...
As a Qt developer, I find the former more elegant and self-documenting.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160316/16014d21/attachment.html>
More information about the Interest
mailing list