[Interest] Are slots even needed these days?

[Bob Hood]

On 3/16/2016 5:02 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> I find them both pretty bad L…  I have spent too much time, looking at other 
> people’s code trying to figure out “why” it wont connect, only to realize 
> someone had snuck in a “private:” second so moc didn’t generate the slot 
> information.
>
> I prefer “slotFoo” and “slotBar” as well as “sigFoo” and “sigBar”
>
>
> It really lets the methods stand out as slots and signals.. It also means, 
> don’t think “sender()” can ever valid if you are not in a “slotXYZ” function.
>
>

I actually prefix my slot method names with "slot_" and signals with "signal_" 
so they are also easily identifiable in the C++ module as I'm looking through 
the code.  More self-documentation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160316/ef0e790e/attachment.html>