[Interest] Are slots even needed these days?
Till Oliver Knoll
till.oliver.knoll at gmail.com
Thu Mar 17 08:37:36 CET 2016
> Am 16.03.2016 um 23:41 schrieb Bob Hood <bhood2 at comcast.net>:
>
>> On 3/16/2016 3:37 PM, André Pönitz wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:31:33PM +0000, Gian Maxera wrote:
>>>> I can connect to Foo::bar either way. If I don't intend to ever use
>>>> the old-style connect syntax, is there a reason to have "public
>>>> slots:" anymore?
>>> One reason that for me it’s fundamental: Readability of your code !!!
>> It doesn't make the code more readable then a comment
>>
>> // This is a slot !!!
>> void foo();
>
> I would argument that it does when you have legions of people out there already conditioned to this:
>
> ...
> public slots:
> void bar();
> void foo();
>
This.
:)
Cheers,
Oliver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160317/8bb3d08c/attachment.html>
More information about the Interest
mailing list