[Interest] License regarding question

Andy asmaloney at gmail.com
Tue Nov 29 15:00:21 CET 2016


Back to Alexander's question...

Should he choose to contribute the fixes back, signing up for, setting up,
and working with gerritt is a PIA if you aren't using it frequently.

So I would suggest reporting the bug at https://bugreports.qt.io and
attaching the fixes - then at least it exists somewhere and can be
found/looked at/integrated by someone in the future.

Thanks Alexander!

---
Andy Maloney  //  https://asmaloney.com
twitter ~ @asmaloney <https://twitter.com/asmaloney>


On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru>
wrote:

>
>
> 29.11.2016, 14:57, "André Somers" <andre at familiesomers.nl>:
> > Op 29/11/2016 om 12:01 schreef Konstantin Tokarev:
> >>  29.11.2016, 13:51, "André Somers" <andre at familiesomers.nl>:
> >>>  Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev:
> >>>>    Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>>    We use Qt under LGPL license.
> >>>>
> >>>>    We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited
> >>>>    connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then.
> >>>>
> >>>>    What do we must to do next to obey the license terms?
> >>>>
> >>>>    Publish the changes somewhere?
> >>>  We ended up shipping the actual patches we made in the installer,
> >>>  putting them in a separate directory together and referencing them
> from
> >>>  the licences section in our about box. We kept around the Qt sources
> for
> >>>  the Qt we shipped with the product in the office in case anyone would
> >>>  ever ask for them (nobody ever did, of course).
> >>  Looks like a violation of LGPL. Section 6 requires you to provide
> >>  _complete_ source code or written offer to do so.
> >
> > We did offer, in the license text in the about screen.
>
> Ah, than it's probably OK
>
> > We didn't ship
> > the complete Qt sources with the product though, but we kept them them
> > around in case anyone would ever ask. Same for some other libs we used
> > and patched by the way. In my non-lawyer opinion, that is not an LGPL
> > violation.
> >
> > André
>
> --
> Regards,
> Konstantin
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20161129/d2e6b878/attachment.html>


More information about the Interest mailing list