[Interest] Qt containers deprecated with 5.0?

Bob Hood bhood2 at comcast.net
Tue Nov 29 15:35:32 CET 2016


On 11/28/2016 11:43 PM, Burak Arslan wrote:
> On 11/28/16 12:54, André Somers wrote:
>> there is nothing wrong with using std containers in a Qt application,
> Aren't qt-branded containers emit-friendly? AFAIK the meaty bits are
> refcounted which makes it a non-issue to pass them around from signals
> to slots (even across thread boundaries). How should one use std
> containers in such cases? wrap everything with a std::shared_ptr  ?

I believe that was the salient point that Thiago made earlier in this thread:


On 11/27/2016 12:58 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> ...
> The containers, however, are quite different. The two most important
> differences are:
>   *1) implicit sharing*
>   2) better naming of functions
>
> [#2: obviously, in our opinion]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20161129/737bd041/attachment.html>


More information about the Interest mailing list