[Interest] Problems with Clang 3.9 and Qt 5.8 preBeta

Oliver Niebuhr googleersatz at oliverniebuhr.de
Sun Oct 2 23:32:31 CEST 2016


I used MinGW in the past as I hate that bloated VS/MSVC. When Qt
switched to Chromium/WebEngine, I got stuck with MSVC on Windows
unfortunately.

The last Months I read a lot of Stuff about Clang and that it made some
progress on Windows. Thats the only reason I keep looking to make my
daily MSVC usage a little easier in the long run.

On 02.10.2016 23:10, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On domingo, 2 de outubro de 2016 23:00:00 MDT Oliver Niebuhr wrote:
>> Hmm I thought Clang would be more stable now. Yeah I am just a
>> Amateur/Hobby Developer. Fixing Compiler Bugs is a little over my Head
>> still.
> 
> Regular Clang is. It's clang-cl that isn't. 
> 
> If you want to use clang.exe on Windows, with a compatible MinGW installation, 
> you can. I don't see why you would, since MinGW GCC is better tested and 
> generates better code.
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20161002/fb074363/attachment.sig>


More information about the Interest mailing list