[Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

[Bob Hood]

On 10/15/2016 6:59 PM, Roland Hughes wrote:
> When you work off nothing but stories you are hacking on the fly...

Ok, since I've responded to this before (perhaps this should be a different 
thread?), I'll jump in there again and clarify where /I'm/ coming from...

First, let me say I embrace Agile, just as I embrace Waterfall, Spiral, and 
all other methodologies.  My issue with Agile is not with the methodology 
itself, but with the single-mindedness with which the industry has embraced it.

Agile is the spawn of Spiral--a.k.a., rapid prototyping--elevated to what can 
only be viewed as a religion now in the industry, so "hacking on the fly" is 
what Agile is all about: Short-term gains from short-term feedback.  In Spiral 
(which was /my/ methodology), you did the rapid prototyping and iterating with 
the customer to ensure that the program matched the formal requirements while 
you developed, instead of waiting until the end.  In Agile, you forego the 
formal requirements gathering step, so you only and always have the customer's 
fiat ("User Stories") driving the direction of the development.  It's hard to 
know when you're really done because you don't really have metrics to tell 
you--or the customer--when the project /is/ done.

In the 2005 book "The Art of Project Management", Scott Berkun observed:

    "For completeness, it is worth considering the simplest possible case:
    there is no project. All work is done on a piecemeal basis--requests come
    in, they are evaluated against other work, and then they are put into the
    next available slot on the schedule. Some development teams, web site
    developers, or IT programming departments work in much this way. Agile
    methods...are often recommended to these teams as the most natural system
    for organizing work because these methods stress flexibility, simplicity,
    and expectations of change."

This was just when Agile was gaining prominence, and before it had pretty much 
overtaken and eclipsed all other project management styles.  Agile fit the "IT 
programming project" style of development quite well ("flexibility, 
simplicity, and expectations of change"), but it did not scale well in all 
cases, and, as some of the anecdotal evidence shows, it can actually inflict 
damage on some project types.

There are people who believe Agile is the best method devised, and like bacon, 
should be employed lavishly and in all cases.  While I think it is 
single-minded, I understand where they are coming from.  I loved (and still do 
love) Spiral.  However, I am suspicious that those who beat their chests the 
most about how Agile is perfect for everything have only ever been in, or only 
seek out, those kind of "IT programming project" environments where it is a 
best fit.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20161016/71555001/attachment.html>