[Interest] Qt at the C++20 era
jeanmichael.celerier at gmail.com
Tue Jun 27 15:08:51 CEST 2017
There's now a paper :
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Corentin <corentin.jabot at gmail.com> wrote:
> It was my understanding that Herb has a somewhat working clang-based
> prototype ? Do you think that will be made available at some point ?
> It would be fun to try to properly implement Qt meta object system (maybe
> using Olivier's Verdigris as a starting point) and provide feedback based
> on that.
> One other feature I'd like to see is to have access to [[attributes]] from
> within the static reflection api ( for which there are currently multiple
> competing proposals if I understand correctly ?)
> Le mar. 2 mai 2017 à 15:21, Giuseppe D'Angelo <giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com>
> a écrit :
>> On 01/05/17 21:59, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > If not, this is vapourware.
>> To clarify (I was there during Herb's talk at ACCUCONF2017):
>> Herb said clearly that all of that is currently not official, not even
>> proposed, so the final thing (if there will be one) could also be
>> completely different.
>> The talk was the first time this stuff got showcased publicly. It was
>> just neat that he used Qt (and moc) as an example of what the new syntax
>> would unlock.
>> P0633R0 does *not* deal with Herb's proposal because there isn't one
>> (it's indeed quoted as "private communication").
>> My 2 c,
>> Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
>> KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company | Tel: UK +44-1625-809908
>> KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
>> Interest mailing list
>> Interest at qt-project.org
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Interest